/lit/ - Literature

>>15372296
>that a certain change from the standard in the limbic system
How is this morality, brainlet? So what if there's a deviation from the brain of an average person? You're correlating morality with the amount of people, since the average person doesn't want to kill someone. This isn't a proof of objective morality.
>giving them a certain moral code, and then comparing the results after several generations of development.
Only if you accept the utilitarian premise where the good=the good for most people, and no wonder you cling to this since that's the only empirical outlook.
>After this the moral code that resulted in the society with the most advancement and highest measurable quality of life would be considered best.
Your claim reminds me of pic related which makes fun of brainlets like you who think that advancement can be quantified.
>Or one could after breaking down how humans react to stimuli simulate what a certain moral code impressed on them would result in.
And this is related to finding out about objective morality how? I'm guessing through measuring again?

>>9998661
>The church spends countless resources preserving ancient Latin and Greek texts from the civil wars raging throughout Europe in the anarchy left after the fall of Rome
>Some retarded fedora attributes the dark ages to Christianity