/lit/ - Literature

>in every Wagner drama man is saved by woman in some form
What is the reason for this?

>>16678357
Holy smokes bro slow down I gotta write this shits down

I've been in one of these threads once(I've been browsing /lit/ for a few years) but everyone told me to leave as quick as I could.

Is there anything worth sticking around here for? Fantasy seems pretty cool.

>>16009835
So that's the correct way? Interesting.

>>15907277
I need to protect drugs? Where would you get this idea????

>>15858128
How so? Societies of Control sees a lot of parallels with Baudrillard's work that occurs in the mid-80s onwards, in texts like The Perfect crime or Transparency of Evil. If anything I saw FF as a critique of the genealogical aspects of Foucault as well as a critique on Foucault's use of desire. SoC is predictive. Feel free to give me a page number, if got FF in my bookshelf.
>>15858147
Check out The Vital Illusion, it's a collection of 3 lectures he gave. It's on libgen, and fairly readable. Impossible Exchange is another good one, but a bit of a harder read.

>>15483747
can we be frens anon

>>15370768
On average how many times do you coom a day?

>>14816377
no anon I think he was muslim

>>14625306
> direct speech of ALL characters must be in perfect British English regardless of their background and circumstances
you, my nigger, are retarded

itt we misinterpret the words

electrocute, v.: to make one's appearance better using electronic means

>>14514457
I never read him.
>>14514516
Generally the answer was "Yes." and they also tend to confirm they can imagine sensations like sight, sound, ect. One time this guy was really shocked when I asked "Can you visualize stuff in your head?" and he was like "No, are you crazy? Are you serious or just pulling my leg?" but that was a single event. I also asked this girl is her internal voice is in her own voice and she said "No, it's just a kind of voiceless, like when you feel a bass line instead of hearing it."

Aside from New York Review of Books and London Review of Books, what are some good Review mags?

>"An uneducated person accuses others when he is doing badly; a partly educated person accuses himself, an educated person accuses neither someone else nor himself."
-Epictetus

What do you understand from this quote? Why would an educated man not accuse himself?

Joby June
ate too many plume
Now his body
fills up the room
Met his doom,
and went kaboom
Because he forgot
to go bathroom

>>14444830
it is scientifically proven that read Guenon raises T-levels in biological men.

Who should I read if I consider social interaction silly?. That is, completely useless, and in fact detrimental. Filling your heads up with the ideas of Group Thinking NPCS through constant interaction is bad for intellectual and mental health. You know what's better for your health then social interaction or sex? Laying on a bed and fucking thinking for an hour. You may say "But if you don't talk to anyone, you'll go crazy." Perhaps. But in the same way salt water is worse then not drinking, interaction with Normies, NPC, ect, is poison. Interaction with a true quality mind is a gift, but most have their natural intellects and curiosities blocked by news stations, social media, their jobs they don't enjoy, fluoridated water, and every method still legal for the public school system to make them Infophobic Bugmen.

Anyways, who should I read?

So what books do you consider the most essential, important, significant authors in literature? A few good examples may be Dante, Cervantes, Shakespear. Authors that all other authors should read. The works which constitute the main pillars of the canon. What authors or books would you consider most essential?