/lit/ - Literature

>>4012020

Assuming you're not trolling.

>atheism is proven correct by modern scientists
Modern science does not point towards Gods non-existence. It simply doesn't point towards his existence.

>they can even prove universe came from nothing
Logically and scientifically incongruous and impossible.

>in fact you only belive in god because you are afraid of death
A very grand generalization. You can believe in God because you want a more fulfilling life, believe the word of the Bible and find it convincing or a plethora of other reasons.

>the religions are just made to control you
This has nothing to do with God and belief in God. And they control you as much as you allow them to.

>but you probably don't even understand what i'm saying because you've neither read krauss or harris
I've Harris' turd on morality, how morality can be explained by neurology. Apparently Harris has not even a hint of moral philosophy, presenting the most atrociously stupid arguments imaginable. On top of that he bases his philosophy (if such a stupidity can be called so) on neurology, a science which has given little to no answers to questions relating to the most basic functions of the human body. Expecting this science to give answers to the question of morality is quite the stretch.

>and you call yourself intellectuals when you really read only fiction and useless poetry
Read the 'Birth of Tragedy' by Nietzsche.
Pic related: why I read literature.