/lit/ - Literature

>>22745448
see this is what I mean, you jump into personal attacks, you won't share anything just like everyone else in pua has never shared anything regarding actual interaction, no one does this stuff in real life so all pua is are just posts like yours, nonspecific praises of pua without posting about anything that can occur in reality. youtubers are just youtubers, they film vidoes with their friends or actors.
>>22745470
It doesn't matter because the opener cannot be used in real life. Men don't chat up random women, they chat with people they are somehow connected to by their social circles, when they know something about them beforehand and have some things to start talking about before even seeing them.
>but it's like in war, no plan survives contact with the enemy
What are you talking about???
Every single war since 3000 years has had very detailed plans/flowcharts, you can go and find nearly every one of them right away, you can find plans and maps and specific movements of every corp. This board about books, we have daily threads about various books involving specific planning coming into wars and contacts with enemies. Models has no flowcharts because the writer has never actually done anything in it or had to form a relationship from scratch. There is no flowchart about this 1 sentence because it cannot happen in reality since it's just not how people form relationships.
>he says intellectualizing is a major blocker
He says it because he hasn't actually tried applying his book to real life and any intellectualizing exposes him as the scammer he is. If I wanted to con, I'd tell you questioning me is wrong too. He has no experience which is why he didn't write anything about contact with women or speaking or talking beyond 1 phrase that doesn't mean anything without proper interaction before and after it. If he had any experience with it, he'd write about it. He didn't, he hates