/lit/ - Literature

Stirner. I am serious.

>>19400666

lol

>>18121597
So if you do not believe in science and also do not give a shit about this god nonsense where do you go?

>life begins at birth; we only know memory begins at birth
>life is a net negative; we only know life includes negatives
>life ends at death; we don't know what happens after death
>unbirth/death is better than life; unbirth/death could well be worse than life
>"if only I/they/humanity wasn't alive"; arbitrarily assigning the problem to living, why not say "if only life hadn't as much suffering"
Please explain to me how to take antinatalism seriously. Stirner holds up to the unknowable qualities of the universe, antinatalism does not. Yes conception is the original act of aggression, no you can't convince me I shouldn't do it.

No I won't.

>>17861010
Those fucking drawings have ruined me, I can’t go through my day without thinking of those handsome fucking drawings depicting the German Philosopher Johann Kaspar Schmidt, more commonly known as Max Stirner. His firm stare, his strong jawline, his sharp mutton chops and fuck me, that smirk, it sends me into a frenzy. I have his Wikipedia page bookmarked on all of my devices and it’s the page that all of my browsers open on.

I want to make a physical union of Egoists with him until it’s in his self interest to pass out. I want him to fuck the spooks out of me until all my holes are dribbling with his milky loads. I want to please his ego to the most carnal extent.

The Egoist concept of property can apply to anything as long as you exert power over it, and here I want it to apply to me. He can exert all the power he has over me, everything is his, including me, his property. Max Stirner might not be the most well known philosopher, but he’s the fucking sexiest.

>>17851015
Mom, just recommend me your essential book list already to understand your drivel or I will spam that Crazy Town song just like I did 3 years ago. Pic unrelated.

Yes

>>17834327

pic related

>>17808677
this

post stirners

>>16040103
The ghostbuster

>>9604234
This is true, but good luck getting the highly-religious and largely-illiterate working class to become effective egoists.

I think Stirner's critique of capitalism is the least supported and least interesting part of his philosophy. He develops an elegant framework, dismantles lots of bad reasoning, and writes some very charged prose. Next to all that, his politics should be a footnote, especially since they aren't derived purely from the aforementioned framework.

>>9605956
>literally include sentence questioning whether or not it's actually in the interest of the working class to oppose capitalism
>still get sperged at by a Reaganite
It's the communists' argument, not mine. Calm down.

>>9606255
It means McDonald's wouldn't exist as a brand in the first place. Every burger-flipper would own his own spatula, uniform, etc., and the group of burger-flippers that used the same stove, fridge, and restaurant would co-own those.

>>9606345
Stirner didn't advocate for an ethnostate, or even a government. Try again.

>>9310520
>there are people this spooked