/lit/ - Literature

>>16970073
I can understand your suspicion, but I assure you, you are mistaken in your accusation.

I want to become a hermit and have come to the conclusion that all social interaction is parasitic. It is always done out of weakness. Even right now I am only interacting with you because I am weak with regards to knowledge about such literature. In all social interactions people are just clawing at each other, trying to derive some sort of pleasure from them. If you are alone, you have the greatest personal freedom, the least risk to be brought down, and most creativity. Only you know what is best for yourself, so why spend time with anyone else?

Hhas there ever been truly anti-social literature that skipped over all the sentimentalism? I don't want to infantile"doomer" nonsense.

I've really enjoyed reading Linkola and Fukuoka, not so much for their ideology, but for a truly authentic portal of man and his relationship with the Earth. There is no bourgeois sentimentalism unlike many of their urban activist counterparts, yet there is still a profound appreciation it. Frankly, I've always been more interested in the religious aspect of ecological decline and have always enjoyed reading Frithjof Schuon or S.H. Nasr's essays on the Native Americans and their relationship to the earth. I also found Evola's book on mountaineering to be interesting with regards to man's relationship with the mountains.

People have recommended to me a Sand County Almanac, I believe the title is, and I am going to read that some time in the future. I must admit I am a bit more interested in the spiritual side as I have stated, and if someone has a good book on the impact of urbanization on religion east or west, I'd be interested. Thanks bros and this is a good thread.