/lit/ - Literature

>>16876306
This is actually a kind and good response and I just want to let you know that I don’t even rely on any of the sources you’ve mentioned and I’m not really as angry and paranoid as you think I am. In fact, I welcome the coming catastrophic decline of humanity, I’ve made peace with it.

And yes, OAN and Newsmax clearly seem to be made up of grifters exploiting Trump’s more conspiratorial fanbase, MSNBC, CNN, etc are all liberal as fuck, Fox News of course is just the boomer controlled opposition to this, making Republicans feel “based” and “redpilled” when they point out liberal hypocrisy and double standards, and alternative news sites like InfoWars are also biased in their own ways, etc., although I still think InfoWars is unironically a better source of news than CNN, as is rense.com.

Anyway, this is useless. NPCs gonna NPC, haven’t even brought up more “wacky” stuff like David Icke and already your brains are crashing.

>>15066447
You think that there’s well-known experts who know everything, whether they’re in academia or politics or business or somewhere else. There’s not. Maybe some random shaman knows more than them about the nature of reality and how to live a meaningful life. Maybe a starving wandering Hindu fakir is the real expert. Maybe Gurdjieff is the real expert. Maybe you are the real expert.

This pic alone gives more info about how the world is run than you’ll learn if you get a degree in political science, but of course everyone has been brainwashed to see these as “lunatic conspiracy theories.” Stop being so fucking normal and assuming academics et al are like some enlightened priesthood.