/lit/ - Literature

>>7493989
>"all my posts have my trip"
When did I say this? Honestly, if I said it I'd like to keep my word so please actually provide it.
>trip standards
This is 4chan, you know this, right?
>if you were samefagging in that thread
In which, there is two. I'll assume you know the "a good anon", I didn't and I personally don't care if you believe me or not.
>the amount of effort you put into hating one writer is bordering on mania
Not at all. I browse /lit/ at random times. If I see a buk thread that I'm going to say something and I think the trip should be on, I trip. If you'd like to fantasize on my posting habits, I suggest you spend your time more wisely. (But do whatever you want I guess).

I normally don't trip on the other threads, hence why the trip is sometimes not there. I take it off so people like you don't bleed into innocent people's threads.
>do you have a personal vendetta against Bukowski?
No. This has been covered by me before.
>Do you think it's your civic duty to inform everyone of his unworthiness?
No. This is the internet. If you don't like it, close it.

If you've only got stupid shit to ask from now on, don't bother asking. You're bumping shit that shouldn't be bumped for reasons that I've covered. If you have a reasonable legit question/argument then feel free.

>>6116992
>If you don't think its pathetic to spend a substantial amount of your time talking about how much you dislike a piece of work instead of allocating your efforts elsewhere, towards something constructive, then you've got far too much time on your hands.
I'm not putting anything of my life on pause. I come here when I'm free and feel like it. Probably just like you. Looking back, it's been almost two days between the thread's inception and me posting in it.

>The alternative is that you're a troll who thinks you're more clever than you really are and you've got a chalkboard with a running tally of how many anonymous strangers have taken your totally epic bait.
It could be the same person over and over. They regurgitate the same shit so often that the comics literally mimic their arguments to me. I'm simply having fun.

>Either way, you're just shitposting.
Fine if you feel that way. I'm just somebody who is willing to have a discussion (or argument) on Bukowski's writing. If you don't like me, don't read me. I make it easier by wearing a trip.

>>6117009
>Incredible how even your webcomics are shittier than most webcomics.
It's a free webcomic maker, calm down.
>Bukowki must really have fucked your mom
Ok, I'll just move on then, I can guess the rest of your post.