/lit/ - Literature

>>14789495
>that's not an accurate summary at all. my point is [thing I never said even once before now]
>false, masturbatory assertion
>false, masturbatory assertion
>A strictly logically false proposition is good logic in this case and good and bad logic are a matter of opinion
>false, masturbatory assertion
>this reasoning does not apply to books etc because books are not constructed to induce false impressions of your own ability and success and games overwhelmingly are.
>what is self-help?
>what is 9/10ths of philosophy?
>what is 9/10ths of fiction?
>what is non-peer-reviewed science and history?
>what are bestsellers?
>Because there is at least one extra layer of abstraction, these are totally different!
>I can tell true from false and you can't, notice how I have used logic throughout my concise, coherent posts
based idiot.

This would make a good book.

I'd like anyone that played and enjoyed the original Dark Souls video game to recommend me some of their favorite books (bonus points if it somehow made them think of it). I realize it's a vague thing to ask for. I guess I'm hoping we'll have similar tastes and I'll enjoy your recommendation.