[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16435794 [View]
File: 82 KB, 567x640, 479d481d09a8506e5d1f90d2adf759d9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16435794

>>16432720
In freshman year of college our final project in Eng 101 was to write a persuasive essay and I wrote mine on why technology needed to be abandoned wholesale if humanity was going to continue as a successful race, basing my argument heavily on Kaczynski. I wrote two versions, one where I used weak, academic phrasing like
>in this essay I will argue
>in conclusion
>In this essay I will conclusively prove
>now let us consider therefore, that
and I wrote one version that used very matter-of-fact, forceful language. Turned the latter in and got a 96%. Went in after and showed my professor the first one and he said that it was terrible although the only difference was the connecting words.

>TL;DR don't write arguments in pussy language, always assume you're right with no doubt in your mind and force your opinion on your reader

Pic unrelated

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]