/lit/ - Literature

>>21462568
>>21463846


Also: if you knew where to look, you could also be inspired by rivals/colleagues from other ambits, not merely from that of writing.

>>21451928


Addendum: this type of artist does, however, implicitly consider what is imperative for others, since it is in universal syncord with himself/herself.

>>21384584


Whoever made that image is an ignorant moron, and so are you.

The principles of nature are limited to, and the facets of nature terminate in, theological primacy —in this consists ordered evil—; the stranded biospirit becomes syntheotically accordiated via the protektion of the strong logosmind, culminating in theological ultimacy —in this consists ordered good—; however, this does not, nor should it, preclude the due benevolent influence of bios through one's symbiosis with nature.

The gnostic regards the world, as a whole, as an excape, not as a hellscape, and knows that one cannot escape it, but may convert oneself through it, transcending it by performing one's alloted repatching of its scape, thus adding one's rendition of it to one's rational texture, and virtuous architexture — to one's inscape.

>>21357384


Whoever made that image is a moron, and so are you.


The principles of nature are limited to, and the facets of nature terminate in, theological primacy —in this consists ordered evil—; the stranded biospirit becomes syntheotically accordiated via the protektion of the strong logosmind, culminating in theological ultimacy —in this consists ordered good—; however, this does not, nor should it, preclude the due benevolent influence of bios through one's symbiosis with nature.

The gnostic regards the world, as a whole, as an excape, not as a hellscape, and knows that one cannot escape it, but may convert oneself through it, transcending it by performing one's alloted repatching of its scape, thus adding one's rendition of it to one's rational texture, and virtuous architexture —one's inscape.

>>21299876
>Biblical pessimism
>Was Paul suicidal?

Improve your reading comprehension; he chose to do "overtime" in life for the benefit of others, but even if, for whatever reason, he could not do so, he still would not commit suicide, since suicide is antichristian.


>Is it better to be dead than to live on this earth?

One cannot escape the world, but one may convert oneself through it, transcending it by performing one's alloted repatching of its scape, thus adding one's rendition of it to one's rational texture, and virtuous architexture.

>The best book that explains why people are proud of their belonging?
>...belonging...

1. People are not possessions; the apter term would be: "affinity".

2. In the world, one is most affined to (from) where one optimizes best—as oneself, so the world—, hence the resulting satisfaction; this tends to be the place of one's nativity, and/or nationality, due to one's inherent folkic affinity to it, although the national factor is not the only, nor necessarily the ultimate, one.


Predisposition prefigures potential; propositions configure relations; all interactive, or interpersonal, relations, regardless of their constituent figures, possess the potential to be optimally realized, and/or resolved.

Degree of suffering that is necessary for excellence —and, consequently, for perfection— is directly proportional to degree of restitution that is required for nobility in spacetime, and to degree of glory that is imperative for nobility in timespace.

In the moment of suffering the rate of one's relief/relevation should exceed that of one's injury/damage; Sofia's optimism should outweigh, and outrun, Ialdabaoth's pessimism; one shoud be capable of inflecting light in darkest of places, and of respirating in the pollutest of spaces; one should be hotter than it is cold.

>>19267812
>...first you responded to OP in a manner that was entirely unrelated to the question he asked, and really fucking presumptive at that too.

How so?


>Now I'm going to ignore that this is a complete nonsense sentence, given that "syncord" isn't even a word in the English language.

You are stupid; wake from your stupor.


>You clearly stated that unless reading is done for the afformentioned reason, that it's unproductive in mediating self transformation.

Improve your reading comprehension; it seems that the presumptuous one here is you.

Communicaton, or inspiration, or influence, is not equivalent with cogitation, nor with creation, nor with selftransformation —which are ultimately selfmotilized—, as you seem to erroneously believe; but, rather, the conversational principle between the aforementioned acts is that of syntheosis, which is drawn from syncord, and which mutually quickens the motions & movements of these twining activities.


>We are of the world, all meaning is of the world, and mediated by our perception and critical faculties.

1. There are those who are of the world, and those who are merely in the world.

2. Meaning is absolute, regardless of whether it necessitates being mediated, or reconciled, due to certain mundane conditions, or circumstances.


>Get off my board you annoying fucking tripfag. Why would you come onto an anonymous Thai crabfishing forum to post under a name.

There is no requirement to post anonymously in this website; being nameless, and faceless, is a choice.

>>19267812
>...first you responded to OP in a manner that was entirely unrelated to the question he asked, and really fucking presumptive at that too.

How so?

>Now I'm going to ignore that this is a complete nonsense sentence, given that "syncord" isn't even a word in the English language.

You are stupid; wake from your stupor.

>You clearly stated that unless reading is done for the afformentioned reason, that it's unproductive in mediating self transformation.

Improve your reading comprehension; it seems that the presumptuous one here is you.

Communicaton, or inspiration, or influence, is not equivalent with cogitation, nor with creation, nor with selftransformation —which are ultimately selfmotilized—, as you seem to erroneously believe; but, rather, the conversational principle between the aforementioned acts is that of syntheosis, which is drawn from syncord, and which mutually quickens the motions & movements of these twining activities.

>We are of the world, all meaning is of the world, and mediated by our perception and critical faculties.

1. There are those who are of the world, and those who are merely in the world.

2. Meaning is absolute, regardless of whether it necessitates being mediated, or reconciled, due to certain mundane conditions, or circumstances.

>Get off my board you annoying fucking tripfag. Why would you come onto an anonymous Thai crabfishing forum to post under a name.

There is no requirement to post anonymously in this website; being nameless, and faceless, is a choice.

>>19018431
You need to ferment yourself with virtue, through discipline —this is not some complicated mystery, although the process to reach its summit may be so, in concord with one's cordiological complexion; the exterior of life is supposed to be cold, not warm, nor hot.

>>18912814
The proper term for this process of becoming is: "integresis".

The agential source of Evil is the Demiourgos, Ialdabaoth; the root of Evil is the Dark, which is essentially, and principally, different, and distinct, from Good, the root of which is God.

The distortive perversion of Good into Evil is one of deflective mixing of the Light with the Dark, not one of absence of the Light, which merely entails nullity; this mixing, in turn, fosters ignobility, which ontologically constitutes the absence of nobility.

Theocide is a choice that is made in violation of one’s divine substance, not an inevitability.

Degree of suffering that is necessary for learning, and, consequently, for perfection, is directly proportional to degree of restitution that is required for nobility in spacetime, and to degree of glory that is imperative for nobility in timespace.

No noble one deserves to suffer, but, rather, it is the current conditions of the world that force, and necessitate, one’s suffering.

Degree of suffering that is required for perfection is directly proportional to degree of restitution that is required for nobility in spacetime, and to degree of glory that is imperative for nobility in timespace.