/lit/ - Literature

The nature of the Unifi ed has swallowed all things into a single unity of all things just as, if it is permitted to say so, the One itself has [swallowed all things] in a single simplicity of all things.
I am more than anything convinced that the truth is as [we just explained] and Iamblichus in many places compels us to gather our multiple conceptions into one center, and to make their rotation a center, and thus to approach the Unified and intelligible in a unified and intelligible way, with one great thought that is both undifferentiated and intelligible. And since it is not easy to project such a thought as a human being, especially for one who is still living on the earth, but we wish in some way to see what has been hidden in the depths there and is, as it were, confused with our own conception after we have attempted to gather that nature as we can, not yet ourselves concentrated in a single intuition, which we were calling the center of all intuitions, we are at first divided into two with respect to the uninterrupted unity: in some way it is unified, but in another way we see it as possessing multiplicity, but it ought not to. For it is not the case that its unified character is one thing and its multiple character a different thing, but these are both enfolded in the Unified. But nevertheless, we are content and think of it as such and name it, in one way calling it that which possesses multiplicity and is not yet the One itself, and in another way since it is subject to the One, we
give it the eptithet, “the Unified.” But that is just a single nature, which not being able to seize on as one thing, we think of in dualistic terms, either as One and not one, or as neither One nor not One, or as both One and many.
>Chapter 106. Purification of Our Conceptions Concerning the Unified
What follows? Are we wrong about it? Rather, we are wrong through differentiation and we are truthful through the unity of these things. And perhaps we can, in this manner, just hit on this truth.

visible light is the perceivable part of the light spectrum

infinitely dense objects don't make sense because they aren't on the perceivable spectrum

black holes are the uv light of the gravitational spectrum

>black holes
>black light

i'm om the spectrum and i've never reading this book