/lit/ - Literature

>>22781263
>All soft, lovable traits were missing from his character. He was also full of himself and unselfcritical. Hitler was an 'empty man' who filled himself with pride and hatred.
Wow very original book Op.

Do you have any suggestions for an ESL to get better at reading English text? Prose I can understand given it is not too complex but any time I try to read a novel or even short story I feel like an idiot, get distracted and just get a translated version to finish it.

>>22612043
>It is the story of Adolf Hitler's childhood as seen through the eyes of Dieter, a demon sent to put him on his destructive path. The novel explores the idea that Hitler was the product of incest.

>>22376390
>th'

>I feel all the time like a cat on a hot tin roof!

>>21772655
What the fuck anon. This is the 20th thread you've made. Many have argued with you in good faith. You've got your answers. Stop it.

>>21662291
>Wrap my point in a funny schizopost
>People answer in earnest
>Write a dead serious post while sober
>MEDS NOW

>had had

>>20830325

>>20414991
>>20414994
>>20415009
>bionic reading

>>19588297
>rips off Wagner
>makes it Jewish and Chinese
>'singlehandedly invented a new kind of art'

>>19452623
>Plato was Judaism

>>19329339
>calling Carlyle a pleb

>>19289112

>ALL
>Fair is foul, and foul is fair:

>MACBETH
>So foul and fair a day I have not seen.

Bravo Shakespeare.

>read writer
>get infested with their fears, complexes and neuroticism
Thanks asshole.

>In 2014 an analysis suggested that his apparently inconsistent behaviour, when analysed by game theory, is actually consistent with a redemption strategy. Only by public disclosure can Tannhäuser force a resolution of his inner conflict.

>>18808419
>experience means you have to have done everything physically in your books

>>18490428
>he thinks Schopenhauer knew more about poetry than Baudelaire, Mallarmé, Verlaine, Nietzsche and Eliot

>>18382280
>and then Schopenhauer:
>>proto-Darwinism
>How did such a radical cosmogonic shift come out of nowhere?
>The only instances of proto-Darwinism before Schopenhauer were Anaximander and Empedocles,

>>18034247
>Flagstad can't sing in tune

>>17848448
Wow, another real story.

>>17794123
>But our love, is it not Tristan and Isolde?
Really Wagner?

>>17773825
>this is your average Nietzsche reader