/lit/ - Literature

>>21601434
>You don’t need to be a leftist to be unsatisfied with “it is what it is.” Frankly this “vibes” argument could be conciliatory for either position.
That's true, although I would argue that how you're using "leftist" here is not really accurate, because to me "left" implies some kind of wish to destroy, disrupt, or undermine the status quo/the current political system for the health of the majority. In this case, the majority of people are either not transgender and/or are AGAINST this transgender "social constructivist" ideology, while the minority of people are transgender and/or are FOR this transgender ideology (and are oftentimes affiliated with govt. or big business) . So the masses of people who are against this ideology are the leftist ones.

And to address this part
>Frankly this “vibes” argument could be conciliatory for either position.
specifically I would say that you're 100% right and oftentimes the rhetoric of "it's just how it should be because it's intuitive to me" is used by the most retarded LGBT ideologues and the most retarded racists alike, so we need to find some objective reality that addresses where the truth is in these claims. I believe transgender people when they say "I feel more like a woman than I do a man" and I don't fault them for that, especially when they objectively present as more feminine, however the line is crossed when they believe that makes them women (OR they're doing it for attention/acceptance with their "progressive" friends). They are not. They are a separate category, and that category is "transgender women". This shouldn't be controversial.

>>20911097
yes! Get that pinche gringo maricón! Get su culo, wey!