/lit/ - Literature

Opening with, 'I am not a hedonistic bastard or immature cunt'.

I like Kerouac because he had his troubles and he put them directly and openly into his work. I'm taking 'Satori In Paris' and 'Subterraneans' here as examples of that. Haven't even read 'On The Road', don't know if I want or need to (sue me).

And the Buk, well I reckon many people can sympathize with his stories, feeling useless or out of place. When you don't feel special at all, so many many are sexist and low deep down, he was an honest fucking bro, and boy could he pace a story and keep you turning even though his message often doesn't change, affecting stuff if you don't automatically reject it because it's 'below you'.

ps: Ginsberg was hopeless, Burroughs should only really be lauded as a character, 'famed' experimenter, and prophet like bro with not too much to say outside of his little oddities of character.

Okay guys, I assume you aren't THAT elitist.
Beats do NOT equal entry level, you know it depends on what level you enjoy the work and which of them you're reading. It is stupid to like all of the beats BECAUSE they were beats, that is a bit backwards.

bye guise x

You're a weak faggot, what subjects do you take? AS levels are usually pretty facile, my man.