/lit/ - Literature

>wood covered with cloth
Hitler was guided by the tree spirits, like the greatest Western leaders, this manifested physically
>automaton with a mask
Hitler recognized his own lack of will regarding his choice in what he wills, he was an avid reader of Schopenhauer
>He showed no human sign
Dissociated from the need to perform signs for the purpose of social acceptance, highly individualized
>single-minded purpose, no sense of humor
Pure tragedian, and his story is an echo of the same
>double of a real person, hiding
Hitler locked away his weakness within his subconscious
>you would never be able to talk to that man; because there is nobody there.
Jung is basically repeating the same things in this paragraph, for Hitler there is Will and Belief, his goal was to embody belief and to be guided by will. Read some non-dual tantras.

Hitler is a fascinating case because he is individualized, distinct, apart, and yet he contained the will of his race, which is an extremely rare combination, and yet his example creates more like him. Hitler picked up on the clues his subconscious gave him and followed it to its end.

What I typically hear from most Aryan-leaning individuals is that "Jung is better than Freud," but that there's something still "off" about him, I think Serrano explained it as the psychological methodologies as being analytically focused.

Princess Tutu
Pls no Borges or Kierkegaard
>>13791271
I agree, I was about to suggest finnegans wake for utena but ulysses fits too

Princess Tutu is meta-/lit/