/lit/ - Literature

>>16947057
United we are stronger.
>>16947104
This is the correct academic definition but still I don't like it. People hear totalitarian and immediately their minds go to oppression and dictatorship.
>stresses the importance of the State
Is not necessary to say because everything already is and always has been the state.
>and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State
It's not an antagonistic relationship, (in theory) rather it is these individual characters that are a mechanistic function of the form the state takes. i.e if the duce is a dickhead and you overthrow him and take his place that is the new of the state. It's an oak tree constantly changing it's forms.
>will of man as a historic entity.
Yes, this along with myth are the catalysts to historical progress rather than material conditions.
Feel free to respond and call me a retard.
>>16947134
Retard

>>16868369
I have only ever seen like 5 posters on /lit/ that actually know what fascism is.