/lit/ - Literature

>>11736575
The implicit argument was that it was possible (and was, in fact, the case) that both the men and women involved in the first 23 encounters were equally detached, and therefore the incel's assertion that there was an imbalance of attachment was false.

Either you're ignoring that argument because you can't refute it, or you're too dense to read between the lines. Regardless, you've resorted to ad hominems and have therefore ceded the point.

>>11151162
>gender
>describable by science
O I am laffin. Read Simone de Beauvoir and Judith Butler.

>>9416445
>>9416471
>>9416480