/lit/ - Literature

>>18434078
I fucking knew it too. I saw the pic and realized what I was doing.

>>18434062
>>18434076
im open to anything honestly, i was sitting here reading this post and I felt my mind just get bigger all of a sudden. I felt my horizons expand and I felt a little gay all of a sudden

>>18434079

>>18434104
Kafka would be spot on, and I had already thought of that, but would a female even really enjoy Kafka? If Kafka were born today and he were trans I wouldn't even be surprised but there did seem to be at least Boyish feel to his books. BUT actually, I remember in The Trial he basically tongues a girl's throat and then fucks his life over after banging a girl with webbed fingers. Those scenes are definitely subtext that I could get behind. Ill check out Giger

>>18434079
never been there never heard of him, but I DO recognize those book covers and i will say: fuck yes. but also fuck no in all practicality, but fuck yes in the general message

>>18434094
this is very true but im doing in this post what she's doing except i'm losing money off of it, and she's making money in one way or another

>>18036402
Cope

>20
>L'amant/the lover after a couple of rereads it still amazes me how beautiful it is
>continue working out and boxing. Gonna apply for school and make everyone happy. I've been NEET for months and gonna put a stop to it. Get a French gf too but a bit hard to come by where I'm from. Learn to paint as well.

Terrible forum organization. Currently it's organized like a wiki instead of a platform that's conducive to discussion. It's better to group discussion based on the type of questions being addressed rather than time period or philosopher. For instance, ethics, ontology, epistemology, aesthetics, metaphysics etc. Also, giving philosophers their own categories stifles discussion because it isolates them from other philosophers. If someone wants to discuss a particular work, they can make a single topic for it in the category of the problem/question being addressed by the work, which makes it much more likely to include people with opposing views and perspectives (people debating results in a much bigger post count than circlejerking about their favorite author).

Enjoy your dead forum.

>>14290575
>"that's not female beauty!!!"
>it's an episode where virtue is confused for beauty
it's okay anon. it's okay to admire the human body.

>>14290452
why are alleged stoics like this anon so cringe and anti-human? can you explain that one to me OP?

What philosophical works are in favor of doing whatever you want and being a rabid narcissist?

Where to start with the philosophy of aesthetics?