/lit/ - Literature

Read "Sex and Character".

>>13983292
Otto is pretty hard to beat.

>>13984289
>>13985183
Second for Mencius Moldbug and Bobby Fischer.

Weininger thread

/tldr/

When you were a child, before your mind was obscured by the fog of lust and an incessant, unforgiving drive to procreate, you intuited the true nature of sex an sexuality, which was that it is an alien and disgusting phenomena, a strange, unintellectual behavior entirely extraneous to the inclination of your young mind to soar above and through whatever subject or fancy you pleased. As a child you wanted nothing to do with women and found them uninteresting and distracting. Your pursuits were multitudinous and you were free from shame derived from a feeling of obligation to the unseemly act of copulation or to the supposedly more mature vocation of starting a family, having a woman birth out in the most violent and terrifying way a couple of vulnerable, naked worms from the swamp of her womb who, to your horror resemble you as some abhorrent abomination or perversion of yourself. Consider that no man has really found contentment in copulation, and that if they did, we would have never invented electricity, philosophy, logic, and so forth. The only thing the opposite sex has inspired men to do is fall on their knees like worthless slaves and write despicable and humiliating verse of song or poetry that not even women find dignified—and so on and so forth it is not needful to continue on in such fashion.

Now the responses will be as follows:

>lol virgin
this means: I am bitter from having the innocence of my youth stolen away by a sudden and uninvited drive to procreate and now having nothing better to do than to go around terrorizing others by luring them in to engage in a disgusting, beastial act the objective character of which I have become numb to

>lol are u going to stay a child forever ha
translated as: my womb is crying out to be filled so please impregnate me i hope the viscous layer of perfume and makeup on my skin is enough to intoxicate you into a dull, animal-like state of feverish passion

>but the species will end
no it wont, beasts will continue to mate with one another meanwhile the elite must be plucked from the ground and shown the way to enlightlenment for the benefit of the world.

>>10745423
Just because you can see the peak doesn't mean you will reach it.

Rest in peace fallen heroes.

Can someone explain something to me?

Evola wrote on the "metaphysics" of sex and of war and their initiatic qualities, and yet the immorality of both has been demonstrated by many religious men and philosophers. Evola also seemed seduced by Crowley's teachings.

It is as if Guenon and Evola seemed to fail to grasp the significant differences between paganism and Christianity, instead arguing that in reality, both were covers for the same "esoteric" and initiatic tradition, but, as far as I can tell, this is to miss certain key points concerning morality as demonstrated by Kant, Weininger, Girard, and others. Kant did not seem to have a high regard for the traditions of the Hindus or the Egyptians, but this is perhaps because Kant was relatively unfamiliar with the texts. Perhaps this has something to do with Guenon's criticism of Kant. Weininger and Girard would have held these same traditions in higher esteem, though they fixated upon Christianity as being a sort of vanguard for a morality higher than anything paganism had produced.

I am mostly concerned that people like Evola and Guenon and their followers suffer from a kind of elitism that you find a lot in the occult. On the one hand you have people like Crowley and Blavatsky, who surround themselves with symbols and rites and things of the sort, and on the other hand you have someone like a St. Augustine, who attains to the divine through profound resignation. Evola and Guenon seem to tend more towards the former.

>>9891509
Not really /pol/, lol.

Weininger was a Christian and supported the emancipation of women.

He also thought the perpetuation of the species was an absurd value to hold.

This would not fit with the worldview of most people on /pol/, desu, which is a vulgar and unholy place.

Heh

>>9878104
Heh.

*sips tea*

>>8928961
Yes.

>>8915624
Now why would you want to do that?

>>8925686

This is pathetic, why in the hell are you guys so obsessed with pussy? The only people who care about your looks is women; as in, you can still make guy friends if your personality isn't a dumpster.

>>7466632
Only for the last few decades have discussion of metaphysical ideas tied to race or culture been declared haram.

I think it's high time we start looking into again now that the universal man of liberalism has proven unable to ever come into existence (obvious, as it is messianic idealism)

>>7332617
>telling her the truth
She should be grateful.

>>7315432
>how are there even people who want philosophical discussion removed
They feel insecure about their own reading ability and don't want to seem challenged by more difficult material.

Was Otto Weininger a genius or just a misogynist who gained fame because of the era he lived in?

Otto Weininger's Sex and Character.

http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html