/lit/ - Literature

>>4189073

Aren't we assuming we can get to the inner workings of the intellectual objects we conceive, and perceive?

What we represent of those objects, are the objects themselves?

Have they got a sense without someone representing them? Have they got a separate entity? Have they got an essence without the use we make of them?

So many questions, so little answers...

>>4189135
I wouldn't know what to ask. I was thinking more of a "relaxing cup of café con leche" and a nice chat in some lost campus of MIT. But I guess that will only happen in my dreams. :^)

I think /lit/ and these questions in general would be much more enjoyable in an Internet Relay Chat. Maybe someday, not far from now, we'll get to have actual debates somewhere, and those logs be stored for the millenia to come. Socrates and his band would have loved that, and posterity much more.