/lit/ - Literature

>>11400385
>How can virtue exist without God?
Not that anon but through teleonomy or ideology.

>>10632055
>See the new argument here >>10631729 you can replace moral value with the right to equal consideration of interests or something similar.
That runs into the problems then which I outlined in >>10631980

>If you can justify something by saying that morality is subjective then I could rape and murder because "lol it's subjective"
Do you understand that morality being subjective does not = a tolerance and equal treatment of all moral systems?

You could justify it to yourself perhaps, but if you could not justify it to others than you would face the consequences of their disapproval just as it would be under an objective morality.

Have you not noticed that in all your posts despite relying on it you have demonstrated there being an objective morality?

Ive attached a picture that might interest you.

>No because they lack moral agency
How do you come to that conclusion when it comes to animals such as chimps, dolphins and pig?

>>10512062
>It must be so as there is no coherent way to understand meaning-making

Of course there is things such as evolutionary psychology and the subjective experience applied to complex experiences and traditions.

Objective reasoning runs into far greater issues of incoherence.

Pic from a previous thread on this