/lit/ - Literature

>>20282075
Saint John Chrysostom would not like having his name associated with this putrid Satanic filth.

>>20245957

Fuck off into the deepest pits of hell with the rest of your sodomite associates, you satanic commie jesuit ecumenist subverter,

You will never cite what any canonised Saint has actually written about the 1054 schism, like St Mark of Ephesus, St John Maximovitch, and so on, because every single one of the Saints will refute your Satanic historical revisionist agenda. Even if you were to do it, you're too ill-willed to do it honestly, and you would cherry pick their writings to misquote what they say to support yoru ideas, instead of reading them fully in context to understand the unity of their teaching.

The only people you will fool with this absurd garbage are people who are either totally ignorant about the history of the Church, or the lukewarm who do not care about learning what the Saints have taught, because they do not actually go to the divine Liturgy where the history of the Church is made clear, because they are atheists who want an outward, political union between the Churches.