[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13237297 [View]
File: 96 KB, 300x400, 9009b48793844a8818a3ae514b0dcb1ca6cb25cfa0b1a3fa7628240bc629bd74.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13237297

>>13236076
>So accelerationism is basically futurist thinking?

I think this is the concept that will go down in history, yes. But not for the right reasons. It will be said, for example, that the CCRU and the theory of acceleration predicted a dystopian reality governed by a state and private technological apparatus and I believe that is the reason why Nick Land, one of the referents in the movement, lives precisely in Beijing. Because that is where the projections of him and his companions were applied with the greatest power.

But I doubt that previous authors such as Foucault, highly focused on control theory (humanities), Chomsky, Deleuze or Guattari and even a paragraph by Marx have not seen that dystopia earlier.

And he did not mention Heidegger because he spoke explicitly of the threats of technological development in communion with capitalism in the 21st century, as seen in this interview conducted in 1969s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtATDlUSIxI

>And tranny accelerationism is pro female?

This is where you have to walk carefully, because while thinking of accelerationism exclusively as futurism, what you identify with "Tranny Accelerationism" are those who accept a place in this "Luciferian" future. Imagine them as Alex's friends in A Clockwork Orange that then later in the story became policemen. They already reserved their role in the approaching world order

>Meltdown has a place for you as a schizophrenic HIV+ transsexual chinese-latino stim-addicted LA hooker with implanted mirrorshades and a bad attitude.
Source: http://ccru.net/swarm1/1_melt.htm

Whether they will become Griffith or Snake Plissken will be their sole choice.

>What are you talking about, none of this ever happened
What Nick Land's anti-humanism proposes is that we be aware that we are the workforce of the present and the future, but we live in Karl Marx's nightmare. We have no choice. Our bosses have no choice. The technological process is out of control and the only way we can get out of this problem is not by opposing each other like Theodore Kaczynski, but by surfing reality. In the worst case, we will not drown.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]