/lit/ - Literature

>>23065163
> Since the 20th century, analytic philosophy has become the dominant approach in the Anglosphere.

The analtical school formed just in the 20th century. There was no analytical philosophy in the 19. Century. Neither in America, nor in europe.

> After the twentieth century, a divide formed between analytical and Continental philosophy, which typically has a broader scope to its philosophical project and emphasised an artistic sense in writing.

The lable "Continental philosophy" is a exonym used by analytical philosophers. The continental thinkers have very differen aprocheds. There are thinkers with their own form of regor like the phenomenologes, in Germany the school of Erlanger Konstruktivismus or the school of von Freytag-Löringhoff and Günther Jacoby (in the subsequent of Ernst Schröder), you have marxist theoretics like Adorno and even such things like Camus.

The term continental philosophy is a complication for the rest which is dominated by analytical philosophy.
By the way analtic philosophy domintes even Japan, as far as I know.

>>22400037
> It's especially embarrassing given that pre-Quine analytics (and anyone who was a competent language speaker of English) understood well how there is a sense/reference distinction,

Gottlob Frege has made the distingtion between Sinn and Bedeutung.

> It's not his fault you or OP aren't familiar with that, I'm not blaming you either though, but he did do the formal work that underpins the meaning and justification of what he's saying.

That a formal framework exist doesn't mean it describes the reality

P.S.: Could someone put picrel. on the statue of Platon?