/lit/ - Literature

>>13111274
>there are people who recommend skipping the cetology and whaling chapters
>there are people who think M-D is just the story of Ahab and the Pequod

>10 percent of all people do 50 percent of the work
>90 percent does 50
>This creates unavoidable inequality
>Cry about the 1 percent having money
>Forget to mention that the 1 percent exists in every single realm of human existence, even the arts, even your own fucking political system has the most hyperproductive people at the top working as an image of your movement and a mouthpiece for its beliefs
>Your solution is not to wonder what causes all these inequalities at every facet of life
>Your solution is to just destroy human inequality
>The top 10 percent will leave because of their capacities as a human being to be hyperproductive
>Left with a shithole of a country working on 50 percent of its capacities
>Your system doesn't allow any form of biological disparities to be created that creates the somewhat favorable societal structures better than being a caveman

>>9576937
yeah, sure, give me a taste

>>9571228
>A book only takes a couple of hours to read.

>>9542015
I agree.

Let's make a humanities focused chan. The imageboard layout is great but we need enforced semi-anonymity and a distancing from shiposting boards.

Restrict the boards to SFW humanities/creative topics. Basically from /lit/ to /mu/ to /out/... /ck/, /fit/.

It's fine that you want to be edgy on the internet. I get it. But at a certain point boards need to be able to discuss their own topics. It's annoying to have every board end up being that topic discussed through a /pol/ lens (either for or against). I'm really tired of these debates.

Ask someone who's solved philosophy anything

>>9507765
patrician