/lit/ - Literature

>these two attributes have always been together in the continuous flow of encounter and therefore, with certain faith and evidence, it should be that all that is fake then must be gay as well, that which can be seen in the double lens that it cannot be seen otherwise as even when it is the latter, it shows the same conclusion yet with the switched position of such attributes

Isn't philosophy, metaphysics, and ontology pretty simple? No one has been able to solve it because they all have the wrong framework. Basically just combine Aristotle and Parmenides.

>True reality is unknowable and infinite
>The world we experience is an actualization of potential (matter) as forms in our mind
>We can never know what matter really is, any more than we can know what the mind really is. All we can say is that matter is potentiality and the mind is actuality
>A greater mind (God) sustains all existence (infinite actuality and potentiality)

I mean, that's it, right?

Aristotle vs Heidegger

Who right? Who wrong? Can we conjoin them?

What if the Far East had access to Greek philosophy before Middle Age Europeans?

Why do most undergrads hate him? He is arguably one of the best philosophers