/lit/ - Literature

>>3278114
You commies are pretty bad at this debating thing, aren't you? Constantly spouting "troll" is not a sufficient replacement for an argument.

>>3266219
>According to the police, you're a vagrant who causes problems.

No, according to the security agency who has attacked me for no reason and this is known throughout the community. It would be in the banks interest to give me money knowing that I have had force used upon me unjustly and have a large settlement awaiting.


>>3266222
There's a difference between security and enforcement agencies. The enforcement agencies are hired to enforce the law and bring about justice, security is something you hire to protect you from criminals. In this made up situation the security attacked me.

Mark, Steve and Larry all live on an island. They have to spend all day fishing for 2 fish in order to feed themselves for that day. One day Mark has a brilliant idea, he decides to under consume for a couple days and save some fish for a rainy day in case he gets under the weather(let's pretend he has a way to not let the fish rot, okay?). After a couple days of this practice he has 2 extra fish, and when he goes to brag to his friends about his brilliant plan, he finds that they have fallen ill! His friends tell Mark that there is no way they will be able to fish, since they need to save their energy.

So Mark offers them a deal.. "I'll give each of you a fish today, if in return you each give me TWO fish in return." Steve and Larry agree to this deal in an instant, practically salivating at the mouth, and a week later they pay Mark back the debt.

Now, class, Mark only gave up two of his fish, but got four in return. He objectively profited more from this arrangement than Steve and Larry, does that mean what he did was greedy and wrong?