/lit/ - Literature

>>16526343
How dare you compare Kaiji to that garbage. There's a difference between untilising the medium in an inventive way (i.e The Ping Pong animation) and looking like hot trash (the Aku no Hana animation). WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE ROTOSCOPING WAS GREAT? ARE YOU ON DRUGS?! Do you even know what rotoscoping is? This wasn't "a risk for the purpose of artistic ambition" it was an ugly and lazy practice. Rotoscoping is used when animating a certain task (scenes where a character dances or plays an instrument) would be too difficult and costly to do traditionally so they employ rotoscoping as a sort of short cut. Shooting a live action movie and tracing over it (somehow making it uglier) is not artistic. There are many works who use a lot of rotoscoping and many works with rotoscoped segments that looked far better(meaning not hedious and choppy)and if you any knowledge at all you'd know that Aku no Hana's rotoscoping was shittily done. You childish hatred for conventional styles makes you biased for something that basically just looks a movie with a filter on it. In my dissections of good and bad art, bad art or bad artistic practices are ones that do not utuilise the medium effectively. An animation that uses rotoscope would be a bad artistic practice. You're autistic and have no taste—get your eyes check.
>durr it being ugly fits because the story is ugly
If you think this, you should drop a dumbbell on your head.

>>16223517
You're an idiot. You are equating to the objectively ugly visuals to realism. You clearly can't read or infer at any capacity so it's no surprise you're an anime only ESL baby brain. Read the manga