/lit/ - Literature

>Let not propositions and 'ideas' be the rules of your being (Sein). The Führer alone is the present and future German reality and its law. Learn to know ever more deeply: that from now on every single thing demands decision, and every action responsibility. Heil Hitler!

>The German people has been summoned by the Führer to vote; the Führer, however, is asking nothing from the people; rather, he is giving the people the possibility of making, directly, the highest free decision of all: whether it – the entire people – wants its own existence (Dasein), or whether it does not want it. [...] On November 12, the German people as a whole will choose its future, and this future is bound to the Führer. [...] There are not separate foreign and domestic policies. There is only one will to the full existence (Dasein) of the State. The Führer has awakened this will in the entire people and has welded it into a single resolve.

>.The origin of all political action is not in knowledge, but in being. Every Führer is a Führer, must be a Führer [italics in original], in accordance with the stamp in his being, and simultaneously, in the living unfolding of his proper essence, he understands, thinks, and puts into action what the people and the state are.

>We have witnessed a revolution. The state has transformed itself. This revolution was not the advent of a power pre-existing in the bosom of the state or of a political party. The national-socialist revolution means rather the radical transformation of German existence. [...] However, in the university, not only has the revolution not yet achieved its aims, it has not even started.

>On November 3, 1933, Heidegger issued a decree applying the Nazi racial policies to the students of Freiburg university. These laws meant that Jews were now indirectly and directly dissuaded or banned from privileged and superior positions reserved for "Aryan Germans." Heidegger announced that economic aid would henceforth be awarded to students who belonged to the SS, the SA, or other military groups but would be denied to "Jewish or Marxist students" or anyone who fit the description of a "non-Aryan" in Nazi law.


>...The origin of all political action is not in knowledge, but in being. Every Führer is a Führer, must be a Führer [italics in original], in accordance with the stamp in his being, and simultaneously, in the living unfolding of his proper essence, he understands, thinks, and puts into action what the people and the state are.

What did he mean by this?

The kingdom of god is within you and can only be reached by laying claim to the time and space you as Being have been allotted, through deliberate action.

>>19291324
>is he our guy
Maybe, explain how he did it first

was he trying to restore the bicameral mind?

A long time ago I ordered "being and time" bc i thought i was an intellectual (it turned out i was a brainlet pseud). Anyway, I still have it and recently I've been flipping through it on thte toilet and Why is it so long? Flip to page 400 and he's still like "now that we have laid the preporatory work for blablabl... we can talk about blablalbla" which he was talking about on the first page. What's the point? Was he trying to hit a minimum word count?

Can someone give me a qrd? Does he make any conclusions on the ultimate nature of existence or does it all boil down to "just b urself"?

>>17701640
Filtered
>Heidegger read The Will to Power as the culminating expression of Western metaphysics

>>17672548

Does this change any of your opinions on the man?

>>16280201
>hole posting

>>16047080
>>16047103
The absolute cope

>see retarded post
>write up a rebuttal while shaming the idiot who posted that shit
>glance again over the discussion after posting my smartass reply
>realise i misunderstood his argument
>close tab as fast as I can
>leave /lit/ for the day
>never check back on that thread

>>16002978
Didn't filter one man.

>>15971731
>>15971743
Nein.

Your temporary elucidatory impressions of contexts and rules of thumb, hold no metaphysical ground but common -contextual- observations. Read a book, even if it's just pessimists like Schopenhauer that better put what you're trying to make an emotional point about.

>>15866236
>>15866368
I know.

>>15836601
Death makes life what it is; according to Hoydegger anyway.

>>15829472
Yes.

>"God lets the oppositional will of the ground operate in order that might be which love unifies and subordinates itself to for the glorification of the Absolute. The will of love stands about the will of the ground and this predominance, this eternal decidedness, the love for itself as the essence of being in general, this decidedness is the innermost core of absolute freedom."
>"Philosophy will not be able to effect an immediate transformation of the present condition of the world. This is not only true of philosophy, but of all merely human thought and endeavor. Only a god can save us. The sole possibility that is left for us is to prepare a sort of readiness, through thinking and poeticizing, for the appearance of the god or for the absence of the god in the time of foundering [Untergang] for in the face of the god who is absent, we founder. Only a God Can Save Us."
>"For us contemporaries the greatness of what is to be thought is too great. Perhaps we might bring ourselves to build a narrow and not far reaching footpath as a passageway."
>“There is a thinking more rigorous than the conceptual”
>“...the most extreme sharpness and depth of thought belongs to genuine and great mysticism”
~Martin Heidegger

>Wisdom is one thing: to know the will that steers all things through all.
>This world-order, the same of all, no god nor man did create, but it ever was and is and will be: everlasting fire, kindling in measures and being quenched in measures.
>The invisible structure is greater than the visible.
~Heraclitus

>"And for these reasons, and out of such elements which are in number four, the body of the world was created, and it was harmonised by proportion, and therefore has the spirit of friendship; and having been reconciled to itself, it was indissoluble by the hand of any other than the framer."
>Wherefore also we must acknowledge that there is one kind of being which is always the same, uncreated and indestructible, never receiving anything into itself from without, nor itself going out to any other, but invisible and imperceptible by any sense, and of which the contemplation is granted to intelligence only.
~Plato

>“The Tao is beyond is and is not. How do I know this? I look inside myself and see.”
~Lao Tzu

>>15814863
It's completely untranslatable into modern Chinese, let alone English. I remember an anon praising Boonberg very well, check him out to see what I mean.

Heidegger tried translating it into German but he concluded the same thing. Classical Chinese just wasn't meant to be spoken, and the variety and complexity of meaning one word or sentence can have is massive naturally compared to spoken languages, but intuitively I sense this would have its own trade-off of some lacking immediacy in some respect or idea which I know not because I barely know the language.

>>15782787
I think it's pretty obviously Heidegger.

>"God lets the oppositional will of the ground operate in order that might be which love unifies and subordinates itself to for the glorification of the Absolute. The will of love stands about the will of the ground and this predominance, this eternal decidedness, the love for itself as the essence of being in general, this decidedness is the innermost core of absolute freedom."
>"Philosophy will not be able to effect an immediate transformation of the present condition of the world. This is not only true of philosophy, but of all merely human thought and endeavor. Only a god can save us. The sole possibility that is left for us is to prepare a sort of readiness, through thinking and poeticizing, for the appearance of the god or for the absence of the god in the time of foundering [Untergang] for in the face of the god who is absent, we founder. Only a God Can Save Us."
>"For us contemporaries the greatness of what is to be thought is too great. Perhaps we might bring ourselves to build a narrow and not far reaching footpath as a passageway."
>“There is a thinking more rigorous than the conceptual”
>“...the most extreme sharpness and depth of thought belongs to genuine and great mysticism”
~Martin Heidegger

>Wisdom is one thing: to know the will that steers all things through all.
>This world-order, the same of all, no god nor man did create, but it ever was and is and will be: everlasting fire, kindling in measures and being quenched in measures.
>The invisible structure is greater than the visible.
~Heraclitus

>"And for these reasons, and out of such elements which are in number four, the body of the world was created, and it was harmonised by proportion, and therefore has the spirit of friendship; and having been reconciled to itself, it was indissoluble by the hand of any other than the framer."
>Wherefore also we must acknowledge that there is one kind of being which is always the same, uncreated and indestructible, never receiving anything into itself from without, nor itself going out to any other, but invisible and imperceptible by any sense, and of which the contemplation is granted to intelligence only.
~Plato

>“The Tao is beyond is and is not. How do I know this? I look inside myself and see.”
~Lao Tzu

Like, calm down bro, sure he made mistakes but look at his genius.

>>15762780
>>15762786
>>15762803
>>15762814
Leftoids btfo'd.

>>15417635
>Parmenides
Lmao Heidegger understands everything in his own philosophy but the super secret lecture he did on this that contradicts the idea that he liked the sound of; that is being the true successor to Nietzsche(this rejects the history of metaphysics as Platonism) yet he still just sort of liked the fame association from the interpretation of Nietzsche and nonetheless found him interesting. But he is in no ways actually an inheritor of Nietzsche's ideas, I can't think of even one example of that; just thought that Nietzsche saw a lot in the heart of the world and liked the idea of being part of what Nietzsche was doing. He literally isn't a Nietzschean in almost any way.

Essentially, Parmenides does not lack-answer, and it is not merely a question. Yet it does not give-answer, without question. In it is contained the entire question of the meaning of being in the Greek framework. But it bashes up against its own possibility with the use of the word essence, as being. However even if you are not a follower of Heidegger's being the fundamental truth remains there in the developed Greek understanding of the being of the world, or the world in general. And they are in truth questions that must be still answered today within the frame of metaphysics(and yes Heidegger was still a metaphysician, just a non-substance metaphysics in his own ideas).

>>15380977
Does meaning have intrinsic meaning?

(Alternatively I could have used a picture of Jung)

>>15170897
>>15170954
>schizo
It isn't schizo anon.

>>15024507
>Death