/lit/ - Literature

>>18198839
I leave resources as they are, whether in my hard drive or bookmarks. If I use one for a note, I'll just link/name it at the top.
As far as the natural sciences go, it's not that useful or important to make a separate note for your resources, since that kind of stuff is generally common knowledge. But when it comes to reading the social sciences or philosophy etc., it would probably be a good idea to link notes to the book you got them from.
Picrel is what my prettier notes look like.

Your first note doesn't matter much but make sure you plan how fractured you want your tags to be.
Personally I don't see the appeal in journaling or anything like that,
so I can't say much about using it for daily notes, but plenty of people seem to like it.
>>18206072
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Fjhad-Z61o
>>18208043
I don't have a problem with just putting all my notes under one vault directory. Where else would you put your notes besides ~/Documents? Is ~/Documents/Vault a problem?
>>18208894
I don't think it would be very useful for learning languages. But that's just my style, which is immersion-based.
Making timelines is interesting... you can go as grandular as you want, but I don't really see the point. i.e, I would make a note for 'Battle of Stalingrad' and probably leave it at that, categorizing the specific events by headers within the note.
>>18209335
Based and /g/pilled but how do you implement tags?

Also this whole gestalt is called personal knowledge management so if you want a general it would probably be called /pkm/