/lit/ - Literature

If Husserl critiqued psychologism by showing that logic is rooted in ideal essences and can never be founded on, or derived from, particular observations of particular psychic facts or experiences, then it seems like the only other option he has for justifying his method of intuition (into the ideal essences grounding logic) is to presume something almost platonic? Obviously he brackets out metaphysics eidetically while doing phenomenology, but to begin in the first place he has to at least presume that the ideal is real in some way, that it's meaningfully "there" to be intuited.