/lit/ - Literature

>>20592616
>You define virtue as: 'things Plato likes' so what can I do but throw out feelers to see if there's any substance to it?
You wouldn't have to try and "put out feelers" as to what virtue is if you'd actually read Plato. Still, the way you are fundamentally treating virtue is incorrect, see pic related.

This is sincerely my last effort in this regard, if you do not appreciate the essence of it still, I do not know what more I can do for you, other than stop providing (you)s so perhaps you will instead opt to go and actually read the texts of the philosophies you are spending your time trying to 'win internet arguments' about, as you said