/lit/ - Literature

>>22316383
if you must, read the "look inside" portions on Amazon
if you want to read more after finishing the sample, stab yourself in the neck with an ice pick

And yet, your racist book hasn't been banned from Amazon.
It's because YOU'RE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
You can't even get arrested in this town.
What's it like to be that insignificant?

>>22004930
Experience is not the same as activity.
All of your brain-droppings are unedited pre-kindergarten gibberish.

>>21996320
He turned 34 last month.
Can you imagine having those brain-droppings as your biggest accomplishment at such a solidly "adult" age?
Utterly pathetic.
He's been banned from practically every web site out there, for his extensive spam-shilling, which is why he has nothing better to do than annoy this site.

>>21864451
There IS no world famous author F. Gardner.
Even Walter Mitty would tell him to get in touch with reality.

>>21243483
No, he writes horribly. There's a difference.

It's the usual unedited crap-fest.
Here's the actual record of its Amazon ranking:
Day 1: #86000 (approx.)
Day 2: #202495
Day 3: #211347
Day 4: #320117
Day 5: #398533
Day 6: #495719
Day 7: #554727
Day 8: #632628
Day 9: #241052 (OMG! some sales!)
Day 10: #430088
Day 11: #531694
Day 12: #601990
Day 13: #682710
Day 14: #345984 (at least one sale!)
Day 15: #585473
Day 16: #319885 (an uptick!)
Day 17: #503796
Day 18: #548541
Day 19: #645383
Day 20: #693857
Day 21: #741098
Day 22: #799398
Day 23: #839245
Day 24: #870841
Day 25: #904290
Day 26: #933455
Day 27: #955237
Day 28: #983991
Day 29: #1014560
Day 30: #1043061
Truly, it's one in a million!

>>21213966
Stop shill-spamming your unedited piles of garbage, Gardner.
With your r@d d00d l33t skillz, why don't you go sell used cars or something?
You'd make a hell of a lot more money.

Stop shill-spamming your unedited garbage here, Gardner.
It must REALLY suck to be you, to have to lie in public as repeatedly as you do.
What are you running away from?
Perhaps the realization that you're not special, never will be, and have already been forgotten long before you die?

>>21208961
Gardner posts to Reddit:
https://reddit.com/comments/j7poea
Big surprise, it's spam-shilling.
All he does it talk about himself.
Didn't his parents raise him better?

>>21202653
Report on what grounds?

>>20804469
There is nothing "quality" about Gardner's writing.
They contain rampant atrocities against spelling, punctuation, grammar, plot, and characterization.
I wrote better than this when I was 8.
But since he won't shut up, the only thing to do (after reporting the advertising/begging) is to fill the thread with the truth about him and his "books", so that each serves as a warning to any unlucky anon that might stumble across his abominations.

He's not. He's a self-promoting, self-stroking, shill-spamming lolcow.
Even worse, he's boring as hell.

you didn't read the "look inside" portion on amazon?
then you're an idiot and you deserve your 14yo cousin's permanent hatred.

he writes like a developmentally-disabled adult who functions at a 7yo level but knows about his pee-pee. here's an example from "limbo's rainbow":

>An eternal night, was stretched out as far as Otto
>could see. The sky was pitch black, and seemed to
>last forever. Not a single star was in the sky. Very
>different from the sky back on Earth. In the mortal
>world, Otto could usually see at least some stars.
>Otto’s home was in Chicago. In the city. So, that
>meant the sky wasn’t always as clear as it would
>be, otherwise. In the country, the stars in the sky
>can seem boundless. They’re visible and plentiful.
>But in Chicago, it wasn’t quite as clear. You couldn’t
>see as many of them, but they were still there. This
>place however, was unlike Chicago. There wasn’t a
>single star which the boy could detect. The sky was
>empty, devoid of a single star. It was just pure
>darkness above him. Starless.

this is from "limbo's rainbow". he's not getting any better.

>An eternal night, was stretched out as far as Otto
>could see. The sky was pitch black, and seemed to
>last forever. Not a single star was in the sky. Very
>different from the sky back on Earth. In the mortal
>world, Otto could usually see at least some stars.
>Otto’s home was in Chicago. In the city. So, that
>meant the sky wasn’t always as clear as it would
>be, otherwise. In the country, the stars in the sky
>can seem boundless. They’re visible and plentiful.
>But in Chicago, it wasn’t quite as clear. You couldn’t
>see as many of them, but they were still there. This
>place however, was unlike Chicago. There wasn’t a
>single star which the boy could detect. The sky was
>empty, devoid of a single star. It was just pure
>darkness above him. Starless.

no, it's because of idiots like you that actually buy his books.

why would anyone pay for terrible writing like this?

>An eternal night, was stretched out as far as Otto
>could see. The sky was pitch black, and seemed to
>last forever. Not a single star was in the sky. Very
>different from the sky back on Earth. In the mortal
>world, Otto could usually see at least some stars.
>Otto’s home was in Chicago. In the city. So, that
>meant the sky wasn’t always as clear as it would
>be, otherwise. In the country, the stars in the sky
>can seem boundless. They’re visible and plentiful.
>But in Chicago, it wasn’t quite as clear. You couldn’t
>see as many of them, but they were still there. This
>place however, was unlike Chicago. There wasn’t a
>single star which the boy could detect. The sky was
>empty, devoid of a single star. It was just pure
>darkness above him. Starless.

gardner is not deep. here's an actual quote from one of his "books":

>An eternal night, was stretched out as far as Otto
>could see. The sky was pitch black, and seemed to
>last forever. Not a single star was in the sky. Very
>different from the sky back on Earth. In the mortal
>world, Otto could usually see at least some stars.
>Otto’s home was in Chicago. In the city. So, that
>meant the sky wasn’t always as clear as it would
>be, otherwise. In the country, the stars in the sky
>can seem boundless. They’re visible and plentiful.
>But in Chicago, it wasn’t quite as clear. You couldn’t
>see as many of them, but they were still there. This
>place however, was unlike Chicago. There wasn’t a
>single star which the boy could detect. The sky was
>empty, devoid of a single star. It was just pure
>darkness above him. Starless.

why would anyone pay for terrible writing like this

>An eternal night, was stretched out as far as Otto
>could see. The sky was pitch black, and seemed to
>last forever. Not a single star was in the sky. Very
>different from the sky back on Earth. In the mortal
>world, Otto could usually see at least some stars.
>Otto’s home was in Chicago. In the city. So, that
>meant the sky wasn’t always as clear as it would
>be, otherwise. In the country, the stars in the sky
>can seem boundless. They’re visible and plentiful.
>But in Chicago, it wasn’t quite as clear. You couldn’t
>see as many of them, but they were still there. This
>place however, was unlike Chicago. There wasn’t a
>single star which the boy could detect. The sky was
>empty, devoid of a single star. It was just pure
>darkness above him. Starless.

>>20731539
As if.
No one shills Gardner books but Gardner.

>>20653419
>esoteric
You misspelled 'schizo"

>>20453546
>viral
Search “Call of the Crocodile” on twitter, a social network Gardner can’t shill on, this is quite literally the only tweet in two years discussing the book. This is what happens to retards who fall for his scam.
>>20453532
I agree you’re autistic but I know you want to be famous at any cost, so I don’t take anything you say sincerely. Anyway, I’m done replying to you for today.