/lit/ - Literature

What the fuck is wrong with this fag? She cute.

>>10478458
There is only one path to getting over the one. You must read Kierkegaard. You must internalize Kierkegaard to the point where you no longer communicate directly to anyone about her, but indirectly communicate to and about her always. You must realize that subjectivity is truth and embrace the insanity that this revelation entails. Then you must task yourself with deciphering the subversive elements of his authorship. Perhaps you will even discover he was actually abducted by aliens, and still lives far off in space. Perhaps he will communicate to you telepathically. Perhaps he will chose you to be his conduit for the present age.

why did he leave her

tfw you'll never get to cum on Regine's face and send a snapchat to Kierkegaard.

Why live

>>10053991
tfw regine olsen was so THICC Kierkegaard could never get over it and became a reclusive autist rambling on and on like a schizo just so she wouldn't forget about him lmfao

>>9515291
>we transcended the violent and destructive nature of this domination and worked together, the two beta chimps overpowering the tyrant alpha chimp being an example
This is true definitely, and important to emphasise, but it's still reductionist.

We haven't even in this case escape asserting that even cooperation results as a means of defending ourselves from domination. Which it obviously does. But this also ignores the fact that there is something else going on regarding communication which has nothing to do with power or domination except on some very abstract and clutching reading of the communicative act.

Namely, meaningful and informative communication has its instrumental worth, to avoid domination, but also an intrinsic worth, simply to bridge horizons with other people. Communication/cooperation has to have an intrinsic worth, or we would only ever communicate with people on the same level of the dominance hierarchy as us, and experience tells you that this isn't the case.

>>9515307
>The idea that a social hierarchy must always depend on the domination of one group over the other is wrong, because social hierarchies are maintained by the tacit cooperation of everyone.
Sure, this is a step up from the simplistic idea that everything is just domination, but it's still just power relations, as if no other motivations for communication exist. And the bridging impulse might not be as old as the dominating impulse, but it's certainly just as pronounced.

>>9438704
why duidn't it work out /lit/?

Kierkegaard and Regine Olsen

cuz they failed