/lit/ - Literature

>>15191792

>>14218179
b&r

>>14195640
cum in my cereal plz

>>14133804
why are you still drinking cum?

>>14084017
wait does Johnny boy really say "niggers"? LOL I always thought he was a cuck but that's kind of based. Although I'm sure he's only saying nigger to make a "le epic anti racist political statement", but whatever.

>>14068132

>>14048673
You guys all like to eat cum cereal, right?

>>14026539

What will trad Catholicism look like in a hundred years?

>yes I love the thong she wore to mass, it had the embroidered frills, very traditional
>It isn't really adultery if she uses protection, more of a venial sin
>Muslims are homophobic heathens
>Protestants still actually read the Bible, don't they know how backward it is? The Church has already decreed it's outdated

The Fault In Our Stars is overrated garbage hyped up by retarded teenagers and manchildren.

48... what a specific number...

>The work is based around Ibn Khaldun's central concept of 'aṣabiyyah, which has been translated as "social cohesion", "group solidarity", or "tribalism". This social cohesion arises spontaneously in tribes and other small kinship groups; it can be intensified and enlarged by a religious ideology. Ibn Khaldun's analysis looks at how this cohesion carries groups to power but contains within itself the seeds – psychological, sociological, economic, political – of the group's downfall, to be replaced by a new group, dynasty or empire bound by a stronger (or at least younger and more vigorous) cohesion. Some of Ibn Khaldun's views, particularly those concerning the Zanj people of sub-Saharan Africa,[28] have been cited as a racist,[29] though they were not uncommon for their time. According to the scholar Abdelmajid Hannoum, Ibn Khaldun's description of the distinctions between Berbers and Arabs were misinterpreted by the translator William McGuckin de Slane, who wrongly inserted a "racial ideology that sets Arabs and Berbers apart and in opposition" into his translation of the Muqaddimah.[30]

>Perhaps the most frequently cited observation drawn from Ibn Khaldūn's work is the notion that when a society becomes a great civilization (and, presumably, the dominant culture in its region), its high point is followed by a period of decay. This means that the next cohesive group that conquers the diminished civilization is, by comparison, a group of barbarians.

Prescient!

>>13194704

>>13096728

>>13087770
It is fine because I am not a liberal modernist

What are some essential books for understanding the kafir mindset?

>>12439341

>>11070581
John Green. His cereal analogies are spot on.

FACT: John Green is THE thinker of our generation and you can't refute it.

>>10221874
>what if homer was a woman?

That can't be true.

https://youtu.be/MS4jk5kavy4?t=6m42s

As John Green taught us in The Odyssey's Crash Course Literature, the story isn't very progressive. If a woman wrote it, it would be. Its full of slut-shaming and the slut/stud double standard. Some of the monsters are women too. That is not good.