/lit/ - Literature

>>11851537
You not giving justification for your claims is not going to fool anyone

>>6722315
>why would anyone think they're not? it's nonfiction. the quality won't differ greatly

That is not true. If there are "countless" or a large quantity of work there is bound to be variety. Why are you adamant on this position that nonfiction = constant quality? Please attempt to explain this.

>and again, it's contemporary. no consensus
That means nothing. If there are still that many works, then it is the same as what I said in the above.

>also just do your own research
>do your own research
>do your own research
Please stop throwing a tantrum like a child. Embarrassing.

If you do not want to talk about the topic (you clearly do not) then go spend your free time else where.

You can whine and complain about not wanting me to talk to others about this topic all you want, too bad.

Xeno's paradox.

>he doesn't believe in quantized space

>>5185030
Bloom?
>>5185061
>>5185064


>>5185043
>>5185050
Bloom. Thanks though.

>>5185036
What do you mean advanced? Greater and more specific vocabulary?

I know that but an image would be helpful.
>>5185088
Thanks.