/lit/ - Literature

>>13534409
>Atum made himself out of Nothing, unbound telesis, the Mithraic Lump: what about us?
Are you calling us the antichrist?
> We have to make ourselves out of Something: Lucifer hated God not because he was God but because God was First: the spermatozoa-Star, the first to say: “I am that I am” as stellar esktasia: Lucifer did not hate the Father, he hated that there must be Fathers and Sons: he hated that his outrage was testament to his nothingness: as Christ's nothingness was testament to his Love: brothers of an unfathomable patriarch
Nevermind, I should know better by now. Yes: Satan is the antichrist and the Victual Spirit as God is the Son and the Holy Spirit. You had me for a minute there.
>Atum made himself out of nothing, being indeterminate, out of all-possibility he contracted into water and wine: being determinate, the soul must make itself nothing out of carbon:
Yep, the golden mean of entropy [or, "the soul"] is prefigural, and early Platonic concepts of form are just misnomers of this "failure to recognize" (as a non-entropic or not entropic/negentropic-balanced entity).
>LESS THAN NOTHING: Zizek was right about everything: the universe is an alchemical reaction, the gnostic friction of Necessity and brains: “only a few are capable of Love in this world, and they suffer infinitely”: a sorcerer factory: the granularization of the Mithraic bootstrap: which, precisely because it is granularized (per Anaximander), presupposes our finitude:
With Zizek, Diogenes is never far. Great breakdown.
>the existent is an abortive combustion, what is expelled is the condition of what is (and must be) retained: even stars, Schelling's fires “that eat themselves”, are splashed into nothing: only plants feed on the stars directly: the predator of a star is the flower, the predator of a man is his thinking:
Haha, you're starting to sound like Horstmann. I wrote few hundred words a little while ago about the Autistic-Vegetative state of the [retrocausal] Gamer-as-Neoliberal-subject. Kinda wish I'd organized it into my main body after seeing this, but it's still pretty messy anyway.
>the Sun feeds on him as the very complexes it energizes: MAN IS THE TAIL OF A CENTIPEDE: he receives solar energy mediated by a chain of forms, he does not drink from the fountainhead directly: it is not the contemplation of death that saves, but the contemplation /from/ death:
Great pre-Platonic heliology in the early bit, but I'm getting a Ronnell-tier "thinking as such" turn coming.
>Heidegger:
Oh fuck it's worse than I thought
>how could Nietzsche's active nihilism not understand itself as the consummation of the will's “revulsion against time”? How could Nietzsche not see, in himself, the culmination of the very anti-force which he spent his life condemning? THE OVERMAN IS THE OMEGA POINT:
Careful with the legalism/justifications when it comes to Nietzsche, or at least Nietzsche the Dead Man. For all of his anti-anti-semitism, he was no Jew.