/lit/ - Literature

>>20727522
people always come with schizophrenia when they want to justify the existence of mental illness and psychologists, because they know deep down how nuance and soft is really call somebody with sucidal ideation as sick and a with sickness, and they all know (if they only look a little beyond surface) that psychology is just 1984 bullshit calling all kind of human behaviours as psychological labels.
but with schizophrenia they reconcile themselves with that there is really crazy people out there.

>>20727562
>that statement in particular is fallacious
you think you resolved it with your argumentation?. if you understand that i mean human construction you still think you understand earth creation outside human construcion?. legit curious about this.
>will raise your IQ
are you serious?. come on.

>>20271131
>How is it that scientific claims follow the dominant milieu of the crowd?
basically science become the guide, the light, the new church, so this church will change with the crowd everytime till the point they probably end up with a new more accurate form of empiricism some time in the future... remember that science is a human endeavor and its not beyond humanity, science dont trascend humanity like they actually believe it does.
in one or two hundred years a cocky smartass guy will say "science is dead" and everybody will think that is profound etctc...and time and time again. there is really nothing new under the sun.