/lit/ - Literature

I started stealing from Walmart because of this nigga

>>23104555
Contrarianism isn’t the main motive of the leftist

>>22505952
Don’t forget saint Max.

>>22334470
I did not claim to be the rabbit woman.
Damn you're spooked hard with something.

>>22239491
>its good to care about people
No it isnt

>>22129466
I take the phrase “personal god” pretty seriously and refuse to convert anyone

>>22097841
No. I don’t have to live with delusional morons like you.
I talk with you now as a service. Get well someday. Seeing the world as your own and all the people and animals as yours too.
Racists and nationalists always strike me as scared out of their gourds, it’s almost funny if it weren’t so sad.
Take care.

>>22067026
I do.

>>21686335
And you don’t understand what anarchists are.
And you make a guru of Friedrich.
No decent anarchist would no matter how much he admires him.

I finally got around to reading this man and it's incredible how many people misread him. The situation is probably worse than with Nietzsche. Even otherwise very intelligent people have written entire screeds misunderstanding his work on a very basic level, and the funny part is it's not even very sophisticated at all. He intentionally avoids using philosophical language because that trash is for nerds, BUT he trades it for shitposting that you will really only comprehend without help if you speak German and are deeply familiar with 19th century kraut culture. And from reading commentaries + what the average 17 year old schizoid Stirner fan posts on social media (who are his only fans today), my conclusion is that 90% of people who read Stirner misread him, and that out of the 10% who don't, 9% think he's extremely cringe and the remaining 1% take his logic to its end and believe things like "you are obligated by your own interest to torture politicians you don't like to death" (kinda based t.b.h. but whatever I don't plan on killing anybody myself.) The union of egoists idea is certified retarded and where he truly goes off the rails.

It is kinda disappointing more people don't give Stirner a chance (and actually try to understand him instead of projecting bullshit onto him for their own spooked reasons), because he was right about morality and laws being fake even if he was kinda goofy about it. I can't take anarchists, commies, or really any leftists seriously after reading Stirner, they are basically just a cargo cult of his insanity.

>>20828672
OP here. Uploaded the wrong pic. My bad.

>>20121424

>>19888531
>>19888552
This is a modern illustration of the old sketches. He wasn’t a smug bastard, but a polite nice guy

>>19777598
Oh I thought we were talking literature.

SCHMIDT for me.

>>19568226
>Butters doesn't want everyone to be identifiable, she wants to stand out.
Not so

>>19384636
We don’t know who Peter Adamson will place right after, but chronologically he could go with Kierkegaard, Schopenhauer or maybe even Stirner and the others of Die Freien.
Or somebody else. Like this guy >>19385466 I never heard of

https://historyofphilosophy.net/

>>19340660
Anarchism is a challenging of all unjustifiable hierarchies, not the abolition of of them.
Remove the social tools of the undeserving elites and you will improve society by leaps and bounds.

>>19340661
*Stirner exhales puff of smoke in your face*

>>19179279
My GF is my property.

>>19095884
No. Keep seething

>>19007306
>morals

>>18941793
Seems a bit reckless

> lol, you read René Guénon, the spook lover?

Are "Spooks" /lit/?

Is "spook" a codeword for "nigger"? Also is this thread /lit/?