/lit/ - Literature

>>16506871
>waow this is so relatable!!
I thought about majoring in creative writing, but I realized I could just read the same books and learn it on my own. There are even online courses and workshops you can take from published authors

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/sep/21/best-books-of-the-21st-century

well?

>>16333298
He just needs to clean up his mustache and open his mouth a little bit

>>16329834
>Richard Dawkins
The devil is cackling as he prepares a special place in hell for this pseud after he dies

>paradigmatic

>>16323857
>Richard Dawkins

>>16304010
>CONTENT

>>16194189
>1. Whatever
>Guys guys guyyyyyyys this is literally meeeeeee

>>15830311
>2015 to 2020, the average world fertility rate was 2.5 children per woman,[6] about half the level in 1950–1955 (5 children per woman).

>>15158596
>every Zoroastrian is wrong! I've discovered the real Zoroastrianism by reading the english translation of the Avesta here in my Kansas basement

>So were Homer, Hesiod, Archilochos, Sappho, Alkman, Pindar, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes, Herodotus, Thucydides, Heraclitus, Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, and so on and so on...

>>15083880
>muh demons

Forty two

>dailystormer

>>14874771

The most Alpha of all alpha males.

This is your read, Bernie Bros!

>>14841353

>>14833521
>that italians are genetically european and look phenotypically european is just the latest opinion!
>s-stop being so emotionally persuaded!

>genre lit

>>14582919
>God is not fucking real, you buffoon.

>>14576474
>spooky

>see scary big octopus monster from space
>brain go cray-cray

>>14416716
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered. You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

>>14168255
>I WANT TO FUCKING SMASH YOUR HEAD OPEN STOP TALKING ABOUT KIERKEGAARD
>He is the ESSENTIAL pseud-author
>More of a poet than a metaphysician.
>Reminder that if you're Christian you wouldn't be recommending him, considering all of his work is FUCKING HERETICAL
>Do you even read what you preach, you half witted imbecile? Or do you really believe that God can command something that is unethical? If you do, you would be righteously put to death for causing the little ones to stumble a la mode Mark 9:42
>""If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea."
>You are either advocating for heresy or are just fucking stupid. Either way, DIE!

>DUDE SAM HARRIS BRIDGED THE OUGHT IS GAP