/lit/ - Literature

>>18679497
>Why does someone who seeks to abolish morality give a shit whether he is imposing his will unto others?
He doesn't.
However if you assert yourself on other it isn't a union of egoists.
Its one ego asserting authority over others.
Simple as.
>The Fascists unlike the Stirnerites had more balls.
With the exception of Dirlewanger who put egoism into praxis.
>Stirner wants to abolish Morality because it is imposed on to him by spooks. He quite literally wants to be able to do whatever he wants without any external constraints on his ego.
DANGEROUSLY BASED

>>18679522
Stirner never said abolish morality.
Correct he rejected its existence all together, For him, you cant abolish something that doesn't exist.
>morality is actually useful for an egoist because "morality" is a personal prerogative.
t. a spooked faggot.
>Stirner said he condemns thieves not because their evil, but because condemning protects him from theft.
so long as you ignore the part where he says that he asks for no right and respect no in return.
Also that part where he said "I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property!”
Pls read Stirner before you try to speak on his philosophy.