/lit/ - Literature

>Also with the categorical imperative I see no reason to believe it as objective truth rather then the arbitary creation of Kant
Arbitrary creations? In the second critique, in order to prove that the CI is the moral law, Kant gives a rigorous step-by-step argument. Which steps, in your opinion, fail to establish the CI?

>>17326464
The a posteriori knowledge that OPs pic is actually not Immanuel Kant but Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi is clearly synthetic, since the identity of the subject of the painting is not entailed by the concept of OP's pic, nor by the sensible representation of that painting.
The a propri judgement "OP is a faggot" is analytical, since being a faggot derives from the concept of "OP": one cannot think about the OP without thinking he's a faggot, just like one cannot think about a body without thinking its extension