[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.20404310 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, pepe_shadows.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20404310

>>20404301
based asimov

>> No.19927672 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, 1614180401032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19927672

>>19927044
iocum tuum cognosco, anone

>> No.18256540 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, 1614521405092.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18256540

>>18254650
>author mentions even a single black character
>I close the book immediately, then toss the book in my bonfire

>> No.17663518 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, 1614180401032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17663518

What are some books that brutally filters midwits and brainlets? I'm curious what is considered a "hard book"

>> No.17633526 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, 1613740450950.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17633526

What books will help me counter the "white privilege" and "male privilege" arguments?

>> No.17588478 [View]
File: 396 KB, 820x836, 1613308867769.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17588478

>The problem is that the determinists created a definition of ""free" will" that makes "free" will impossible. They simply defined free will out of existence. Ask a determinist to give an example of free will, under his definition, and he will admit that he can't give such an example, because it is impossible by definition.

>If you simply view "free will" as the ability to make choices based on self interest, without coercion, you will not be able to claim free will doesn't exist.
Books with this kinda feel?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]