/lit/ - Literature

IT IS NOT A PROBLEM OF «MODERN FANTASY» —REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER THAT MEANS—, BUT, RATHER, THE GENRE OF «FANTASY» ITSELF IS THE PROBLEM; IT IS ANTILITERARY KITSCHY SCHLOCK THAT FOSTERS DELUSION —THE SAME JUDGEMENT IS APPLICABLE TO SOCALLED «SCIENCE FICTION».

>>16993860
>... nationals for poetry out loud...

>>16939870


1. THAT POEM IS MEDIOCRE, HOKEY, AND SLIGHTLY KITSCHY.

2. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG IN ITSELF REGARDING GIFTING, OR DEDICATING, SOMEONE A POEM; UNLESS THAT THE POEM IS OFFENSIVE IF THE RECIPIENT BECOMES REPULSED BY YOUR GIFTING THEM A POEM YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THAT YOU HAVE SAVED YOURSELF TIME OF YOUR LIFE THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN WASTED ON THAT PERSON; IN THIS SENSE POETRY CAN BE A GOOD LEAD FOR SOUNDING THE PERSONAL QUALITY OF AN ACQUAINTANCE —IF SOMEONE DISLIKES POETRY THAT SOMEONE IS HUMAN TRASH.

>>16890668
>E. Stanley Jones
>Christian missionary


...

«PROTESTANTS» ARE ANTICHRISTIAN.

>>16794314


>LEER POESÍA TRADUCIDA.


...

>>16770978


THEY ARE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOMETHING CALLED: «PERSONAL STYLE».

>>16694425


?

1. THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HAS NEVER BEEN CHARACTERIZED FOR ITS POETICAL WORKS, NOR BY THE EXCELLENCE OF ITS LITERATURE IN GENERAL.

2. YES, POETRY, AS AN ART, IS DECADENT BECAUSE THE WORLD'S DEGENERATION IS IN ITS LATTER PHASES, BUT TO INFER THE DECADENCE OF POETRY, AS AN ART, FROM THE DECADENCE OF POETRY IN ENGLISH, CONSTITUTES A FALLACIOUS ACT.

3. POETRY IS NOT DEAD, BUT, RATHER, THE LIVING DEAD CANNOT COMPOSE POETRY.