/lit/ - Literature

Books on r/k selection theory? Legit or no?

>>17714480
look at this faggot.
Yes, biological factors like lower cranial capacity, lower IQ. Blacks are literal archaic Homo sapiens, you can't classify them as anatomically modern Homo sapiens

>>17322970
this thread is research in r/k selection. You can easily see the disparity when the test subjects are from a topic like literature. It tends to draw more "romantic, head in the clouds" and less rational individuals. /lit/ would make decent parents - the ones that aren't schizo tranny freaks that is- but terrible statesmen or soldiers. tl;dr they can never run anything of importance that requires precision and rationality because they cant even break their programming to find the problem. This is largely why democrat run cities are largely shithole hugboxes full of drug addicts, ghettos and single moms.