/lit/ - Literature

>>6360781
>when there is no good reason to believe in Jesus' resurrection

Not true. The resurrection is one of the most widely attested to events in antiquity as evidence by the huge proliferation of the Gospels in the centuries following Christ's death. Now I'm sure you'll say "how can you trust the Gospels which were written at least a hundred years after Christ's earthly ministry?" My answer is that Christianity spread prior to the Gospels being written (see Paul) and naturally belief in the resurrection spread with it. The fact that Christianity was able to spread suggests that it is true or otherwise people would have rejected it. Don't play the "they were just superstitious ancients who didn't know any better" card because the resurrection was considered just as ludicrous back then as it is today yet they still believed just as I still believe.

>>6121038

I'm legitimately inspired, Anon.

Godspeed.

>>6096837
Thank you for sharing your opinion.