/lit/ - Literature

>>19455239
>serve the church of Jesus Christ as he saw fit
Yeah, he did for sure, but not the same church you attend. Also St. Mark of Ephesus is a saint precisely because of his fight against the demonic inventions of the Latin church, and he is somehow also a saint for the RCs now despite being a condemned heretic before, same for St. Photios who was literally 'deposed' and condemned by the West. It's literally fairy-tale fan-fiction multiverse type stuff. I will not be surprised if Mohammad's sainthood will be considered in 20 years, as a man who was invincibly ignorant and tried to serve Christ in his own way by fighting idolatry in Arabia.

>"The Latins are not only schismatics but heretics... we did not separate from them for any other reason other than the fact that they are heretics. This is precisely why we must not unite with them unless they dismiss the addition from the Creed filioque and confess the Creed as we do."
This man is a saint in RCism. Were Arius and Nestorius perhaps also pious men, who are perhaps saved?

>invincible ignorance
Idolatrous pagans are still damned based on their rebellion against the law written on their heart, same for all heretics. Christ's truth is plain to accept if you want the truth and value it above your evil deeds. There is no magical "invincible ignorance". It's literally a modernist innovation crafted to fit God into a distorted idea of goodness. St. Paul clearly speaks of those outside the law being judged, not justified, outside the law.