>>15964771
>>15964677
>>15964630
It's a rhetorical device called a polysendeton. It's written this way for effect, and writers have been doing this for a long, long time. Rhetorical devices are always breaking, mostly arbitrary, grammatical rules.
And then there's this faggot >>15964771 who thinks good grammar = good writing but doesn't understand rhetoric or composition.
No, John Green is not a particularly good writer, and I'm not defending him. You can have problems with this passage, fine, but when you guys REEEEEEE about the "and and and and", it's clear you don't know what you're talking about, so why should anyone trust your observations about any other aspect of writing?
Stop being ignorant faggots, and learn how to read properly. Step one is to be quiet and to think better about what you're reading and what you might say, even for an author like John Gree. because maybe you don't know what you're talking about after all.