/lit/ - Literature

>people still believe in the debunked Dark Ages MYTH
>people still believe in the debunked "religion vs science" conflict MYTH

Even the positivist technocrats over at Wikipedia take the editorial line that these Enlightenment chauvinisms have been REFUTED:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_thesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)

How are materialist/nihilist ideologies even considered within the designation of 'philosophy'? The entire conclusion is cooming and consumption of product? Both Marxism and Capitalism btw. Difference is, Marx alongside his ugly Last Man (lack of) ideal where all material needs and comforts are adequately provided, he throws in some real spooky retardation like some kind of overwhelming satisfaction found in working. Meanwhile, based on debunked blank slate autism, this Last Man is taking up one craft on X day, then shifting it to another on Y day, all somehow fulfilling him completely and being an expression of himself (but what is he? he's just a weird coomer satisfying animal sensory demands).

Ayn Rand, Molyneux and co all have the same formula. Satisfying material needs/wants + throwing in superficial spooks of self-fulfillment via interacting in an economy = profit??? Materialists/atheists/nihilists cannot be considered philosophers. These people are slaves of their senses, and want to drag men into dystopic mouse utopias

>>11880648
>Zeno's Enchiridion
>oh dear

How can I write about sex and girls if I'm a virgin loser?

>>10520955
>>10521076
>unironically using the k-word on an intelligent board